Sport, Arts and Culture Department opts for symbolism rather than economic growth
- Jan 29
- 2 min read

The Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) views the decision of the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, to approve name changes in the Eastern Cape as proof that limited public funds are wasted on misguided priorities.
The very same Department that approved 21 geographical name changes – including several costly ones, such as East London to KuGompo City and Graaff-Reinet to Robert Sobukwe Town – refused to provide the funds needed for hosting the international Corona Open J-Bay surfing competition in Jeffreys Bay.
This world-class event, the only Championship Tour competition on the African continent, serves as a major annual economic injection for the Eastern Cape through tourism, job creation and international exposure.
Its cancellation for 2026 is the direct result of the Department’s refusal to provide the necessary funds.
While millions are spent on symbolic name changes that divide communities and hike up administrative costs (including creating new signage, maps, documentation and marketing), a proven economic driver such as the J-Bay Open is sacrificed.
In the Freedom Front Plus’s view, this decision is part of a broader pattern in which ideology and symbolic transformation are prioritised above practical economic growth and job creation.
In addition, the Freedom Front Plus questions the legitimacy of the so-called process used to justify these name changes. Most residents were clearly opposed to it, so, the process does not reflect what the community wants.
The party will take steps to ensure the communities' voices are heard and that the Department is held accountable for its spending of public funds.
In a time of record-high unemployment, poverty and a struggling economy, South Africa simply cannot afford to waste money on controversial name changes while missing opportunities that actually add value.
The Freedom Front Plus demands that the Minister and Department reconsider their priorities and focus on projects that provide tangible economic benefits for all South Africans – rather than on costly, divisive symbolism.



Comments